FOLLOW US:
Jason Paquin
Ryan Lakey
Tom Kehn
Patrick Johnson
Andy Shepherd
Jason Pepino
Lance Hukill
I often get asked, “What is the best MAM?” Eager eyes await my answer at client meetings and conferences. With a smile, I respond, “That’s an easy one—the best MAM is the one that fits your requirements.” While it may sound simple, the reality is more complex. Hidden in this answer are a series of crucial questions and specific use cases, many of which organizations have yet to document.
Every MAM vendor follows a development cycle influenced by feature requests from sales teams, solutions architects, or client engagements. These product roadmaps are driven by the need to fulfill use case requirements. Some MAMs have robust features designed for image-based workflows, while others are tailored for video management. Yet, each vendor will claim their product is the best, within their defined market, of course. To narrow your options, start by identifying the types of assets and files you need to manage and the features required for your workflows.
To find the right MAM for your organization, begin by defining your specific use cases and how your workflows operate. Detail the system functionalities and requirements you need. Weigh these functional requirements with a measurable metric, which will help during the system assessment and ultimately determine deployment success, KPI achievements, and ROI.
Consider what legacy or future technology is part of your environment. Using the 3-5-7 Flywheel methodology from our previous blog, evaluate how your workflows have evolved. What new codecs or systems are you implementing? What languages and API parameters will be necessary for smooth cross-application functionality? Identify your “source of truth” for data and how it flows throughout the data landscape. How do you want your workflows to operate, and how should users progress through them? What storage types are being used, what connectivity and protocols are being used, and where are those storage located? These considerations are vital to ensure functional requirements align with use cases and that the system integrates well within your ecosystem.
Involving key stakeholders is crucial. Make sure you gather feedback from a diverse range of users, not just the typical producers and editors. Then, create a matrix to assess how well the system fulfills your requirements, and another to evaluate usability. Some systems may seem like an obvious choice on paper, but may impose rigid processes that users find difficult to adapt to. When users fail system acceptance tests or create workarounds, ROI and KPIs suffer.
Most organizations have existing relationships with systems integrators or IT providers—use these resources to bridge knowledge gaps. Engage with engineering teams, ans subject matter experts to gather additional insights, and document key takeaways to explore during testing or proof of concept (POC). When conducting a POC, involve the vendor’s professional services team. A simple integration built by the vendor can reveal their responsiveness and ability to meet your needs.
Conclusion
As the saying goes, “Fail to plan, plan to fail.” This is especially true when choosing and implementing a MAM, DAM, or PAM. With careful planning and attention to the steps mentioned, you’ll be on track to selecting the best system for your organization.
Baltimore, MD — Chesapeake Systems, a leading provider of advanced media and audio-visual technology solutions, has been awarded an Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract by a federal legislative branch agency to provide audio visual (AV) and broadcast equipment and installation services. Under the contract, Chesapeake Systems has been...
At CHESA, we dont bring a pre-packaged answer in search of a question. Our primary mission is to first understand your unique challenges and needs, and then architect the optimal solutions tailored to you.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked